Moby, Joaquin Phoenix and Billie Eilish urge world leaders at climate talks to curb animal farming

0
88
Moby, Joaquin Phoenix and Billie Eilish urge world leaders at climate talks to curb animal farming
Moby, Joaquin Phoenix and Billie Eilish urge world leaders at climate talks to curb animal farming

A number of stars, including Billie Eilish, Moby, Joaquin Phoenix and Stephen Fry, are calling on the government to get world leaders to discuss animal husbandry for the damage it causes at the upcoming climate crisis summit. Eighteen celebrities wrote to MP Alok Sharma: President of the Cop26 Conference, calling on him and other delegates to “formally and publicly recognize the role of animal husbandry as one of the greatest causes of climate change”. Other stars signing the letter include: Ricky Gervais, Joanna Lumley, Deborah Meaden, Harry Potter star Evanna Lynch, singer Leona Lewis, Chris Packham, actors Alicia Silverstone, Alan Cumming and Daisy Ridley, singer-songwriter Alesha Dixon, model Lily Cole, singer Finneas O’Connell and James McVey and reality TV star Lucy Watson that animal husbandry should be on the Cop26 agenda because it is the second largest source of harmful emissions after burning fossil fuels for electricity and heat and the agricultural organization say the world’s livestock accounts for 14.5 percent of carbon emissions, but other research has concluded it is closer to 16.5 percent. This is similar to the level that all of the world’s transportation generates together – and the proportion is expected to increase. The celebrities – all plant-based diets – warn that the world will not keep the agreed temperatures at 2 ° C without a large-scale change in animal husbandry systems. The letter, coordinated by Humane Society International / UK and viewed by The In Independent reads: “With animal husbandry being such a major source of greenhouse gas emissions, it is impossible to meet the goals set in the Paris Agreement without changing our global food system . “Even if all other major sources of emissions were reformed, we will still fall short.” Addressing these urgent areas at the Cop26 meeting would spur governments around the world to act and would add another high-i to heads of state and government mpact option to expand your toolbox for combating climate change: “We call for the UNFCCC [United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change] to formally and publicly recognize the role of animal husbandry as a major contributor to climate change and to open up more space for dialogue. “Agriculture; Provide incentives to develop alternatives to animal husbandry and to change the priorities of public procurement in the public sector change. ”So if we want to protect our planet, we must incorporate intensive animal husbandry into strategies to mitigate climate change. Cop26 is one of our last vital opportunities to reform our global food system. ”Each year, at least 88 billion terrestrial animals are bred and slaughtered worldwide, which make up nearly 80 percent of the world’s agricultural area, but less than a fifth of which produce the world’s calories. Animal husbandry is also a major cause of deforestation, extinction, soil degradation, pollution and depletion of water resources due to the vast tracts of land where crops are grown to feed them, a system long criticized by experts as being highly inefficient A number of reports conclude that meat consumption needs to be reduced in order to contain CO2 emissions. Worldwide leading scientists from the IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services) have even brought the idea of ​​a meat tax onto the market. A 2019 study showed that by 2030, without radical changes, the livestock sector is projected to account for almost half of the global emissions budget for 1.5 ° C. The conference ignores the second largest contributor to the climate crisis. The production of meat, milk and eggs also requires huge amounts of water – up to three times as much as the production of grain, a s tudy found. The Independent has asked the UNFCCC for its response to the letter’s demands.

[ad_2]